Last month, I asked whether you supported sequestration or an alternative plan to reduce spending. After nearly 80% responded that they preferred alternative spending cuts, I asked which alternatives to sequestration you support. Finally, I asked which legislative proposals voted on in the House or Senate you supported to avert sequestration.
This week we take a look at a far narrower bill designed to reign in government spending by increasing accountability for federal spending on conferences. Recently introduced, the Agency Conferences and Conventions Operating Under Necessary Transparency (ACCOUNT) Act, or H.R.283, seeks to control spending by requiring that conferences costing more than $25,000 must be approved by the head of the particular federal agency, and must have details posted on the agency website within 30 days of the conference, including the purpose, total cost and cost per employee attending. Each agency would be required to submit a report on their conferences to the relevant Congressional committee for the fiscal year. Under the ACCOUNT Act, conference spending would be public and federal agencies would use taxpayer money more wisely with the American people watching. This bill aims to crack down on wasteful practices and bring conference spending â€“ such as the $823,000 spent by the U.S. General Services Administration in Las Vegas last year â€“ into the light of day.
Question of the week: Do you support the ACCOUNT Act as a means of reining in federal spending?
( ) Yes.
( ) No.
( ) I donâ€™t know.
( ) Other.
Take the Poll here.
Find the results of last weekâ€™s InstaPoll here.
Home | Contact | Unsubscribe | Privacy | Office Locations
Please do not reply to this message. This email address does not accept incoming messages. To send an email, click here.
Trouble viewing this email? See it in your web browser: forbes.house.gov/news/email/show.aspx