Boozman Bulletin: Why I Oppose Military Intervention in Syria
There is no doubt that the suffering inflicted upon the Syrian people who are caught in a civil war to free their country from a brutal, authoritarian regime calls for a response from the international community. Confirmation that Bashir Assad’s regime used a nerve agent against civilians, killing over a thousand in the process, defines the gravity of the situation. The use of chemical weapons, banned by international law for nearly 100 years, is a crime against humanity. There certainly is a need for world powers to intervene.
But what level of U.S. response is appropriate?
For weeks, President Obama has been making the case that the only way to assert U.S. power is to send the regime a message with a unilateral, punitive response. He still appears to be keeping that option on the table regardless of what our allies, Congress and the American people think.
However, there may still be a diplomatic answer. A plan for Syria to relinquish its chemical weapons, initiated by Russia and agreed to by Syria, has the potential to take these weapons of mass destruction out of Assad’s hands. While we should be skeptical of any deal between Russian President Vladimir Putin and Assad, a deal Putin now appears to be hedging, the U.S. needs to pursue every diplomatic avenue.
It is important to see if we can resolve this issue through diplomatic efforts.
The people of Arkansas have spoken loudly, and almost universally, in opposition to President Obama’s request to authorize a U.S. military strike against Syria. They remain unconvinced that military force is the only way to resolve this issue or that it would successfully prevent Assad from further brutal attacks on civilians. It only takes one look at Libya, which is in complete chaos, to see that it’s very difficult to get untangled once you are involved in this type of conflict.
The American people are weary of becoming involved in another U.S. military engagement. In the weeks since the President first proposed a military strike against Assad’s regime, the majority of Americans have become more convinced that the President lacks a plan to accomplish his goals. Many have become more concerned in that time that these goals aren't even well defined.
Without a clear path forward, I agree with them and continue to oppose the use of military force in Syria.
Watch and read some of the interviews we’ve done about Syria.
KASU - Boozman"discusses Syria, and reflects on 9/11
40/29"- Sen."Boozman thinks this is the wrong time to strike Syria
Hot"Springs Sentinel-Record Boozman"skeptical on action in Syria (subscription required)
Arkansas Democrat Gazette - Hoping"Obama listens, say 5 Arkansans in Congress (subscription required)
- Obamacare Implementation: I am supportive of repealing and defunding Obamacare, but right now we don’t have the support we need in the Senate to pass this. In the meantime I have cosponsored legislation to delay the individual and employer mandates, included in Obamacare, until 2015. I also cosponsored the that would prevent the administration from granting union requests for special subsidies.
- Rural Veterans’ Health: Our veterans living in rural areas deserve accessibility to quality health care. We need a clear path forward to provide these men and women with the care they need, no matter where they live. I am happy to join Minnesota Senator Al Franken in .
- Promoting Religious Freedom: Violence in Egypt against Coptic Christians cannot be tolerated. As a cosponsor of S. 653, the Near East and South Central Asia Religious Freedom Act, I support bringing this bill to the Senate Floor to .